When thinking about how "nice" a function is, I sometimes get tunnel vision and only look at the differentiability and integrability of a function. There are tons of other nice properties out there that tell us a lot about a function.
-
Show this thread
-
For example, if a function is monotone, (increasing over an interval or decreasing over an interval) we know that it has at most countably many discontinuities. Also, a theorem from Lebesgue tells us it is differentiable almost everywhere.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
If a function is a contraction mapping, we know it has a unique fixed point and can even get a convergence rate for the iteration x_n = f(x_{n-1}). Useful in the study of methods for solving nonlinear equations.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
If a function is convex, there's a whole field dedicated to their properties and more.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
I guess the take away is I find I need to remind myself that differentiability and integrability isn't the whole story, especially depending on the context.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @LukeBouck
I agree, those are typically the only two properties I think of as defining "well behavedness"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I just ask myself "hmm.. do they satisfy the conditions of Parseval's theorem?"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.