By definition it must reproduce all of our current observations
-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr @HerbertHitchens
Question is does it make any predictions?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cenobyte3 @InertialObservr
How about you
@cenobyte3 ? Which interpretation do you think is correct ?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HerbertHitchens @InertialObservr
Hard to say...I think many worlds carries way too much baggage. I think we're missing something big...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cenobyte3 @HerbertHitchens
It really doesn't carry much baggage when you think about it as a "broken symmetry" as observed from any particular branch.. The name makes it sound more ontologically heavy than it is
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @cenobyte3
Interesting. I don’t know enough to have a position yet, but I don’t see a good reason Copenhagen interpretation rejects any statements about the position of the particle before it is observed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HerbertHitchens @cenobyte3
Unfortunately Bell's inequality is difficult to understand.. but the idea is that if you say that it has to exist somewhere prior to its measurement then you have to give up locality
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InertialObservr @cenobyte3
Hmm I see. I’ll learn more about it when I take QM next semester. Till then, I’ll hush about quantum mechanics (for the most part).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HerbertHitchens @cenobyte3
most people don't actually learn Bell's inequality in intro QM, but intro QM will help your understanding it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @cenobyte3
I found a QM book that includes the inequality towards the end. Also, I can just google it and learn about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@minutephysics has a pretty good video on Bell's inequality
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.