I could if I have all the relevant information about the universe that gave rise to this moment (you tweeting). All I need are information about past events, in conjunction with the laws of nature to predict the current states (on a classical scale anyways).
-
-
Replying to @HerbertHitchens @InertialObservr
But because of both quantum and chaos theory there is a physical limit to how much information even exists...so always some room for inderermenancy
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cenobyte3 @HerbertHitchens
Right, but what reason do we have to believe something of such a small scale has a non negligible interaction at human-brain energy scales? There's just as much room for little gnomes controlling your every move as there are for the freedom to choose x over y
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InertialObservr @HerbertHitchens
I'd know if the gnomes were controlling me.pic.twitter.com/QhOZGIvhy7
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cenobyte3 @HerbertHitchens
hahah yes you would, but not at scales with E~< h
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @HerbertHitchens
Planckian gnomes living in the Calabai-Yaubl spaces?pic.twitter.com/PLPyvFbq10
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @cenobyte3 @spacenerd19 and
Free will imo, is an effective theory since predicting human behavior is impractical using the physical laws of nature. Suggests, we can’t predict things like love or faith, it just happens. It’s like someone wakes up, “today, my calculations show that I’m going to fall in love”
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eloace @cenobyte3 and
The truth of a statement has nothing to do with utility, so whether or not it’s impractical to use determinism in the areas you mentioned still doesn’t invalidate determinism.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HerbertHitchens @eloace and
Determinism didn’t die with quantum physics, but it’s certainly up in the air until we work out the connection between it and relativity. We’re talking about philosophy here.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @spacenerd19 @HerbertHitchens and
Though think of the example of a chaotic pendulum whose sensitivity to initial conditions is smaller than its Heisenberg uncertainty. This system would be fundamentally non deterministic
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
It also wouldn't have free will
-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr @spacenerd19 and
Good point. Free will requires conciousness.. I won't even pretend to understand that lol.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cenobyte3 @InertialObservr and
I’d say even determinism is compatible with consciousness and I can cite some researches that suggests so. More needs to be done on the empirical side of consciousness though.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.