New Thread: Integration By Parts Challenge Claim: Integration By Parts is *never* necessary. In this thread I invite you bring me integrals you think necessitate IBP in order to be evaluated, and I will evaluate them by other means.
-
-
-
IBP Challenge (3): Not sure how IBP would have helped this one, but an integral challenge nonetheless. Challenge by
@SamuelGWalters (yes I know it can be done with residues)pic.twitter.com/G2ut5BGKY7
Show this thread -
IBP Challenge (4): ∫eˣ sin(x) dx sans Integration by Parts.pic.twitter.com/JlLf9xWh1H
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What about this one? $\vec{a}$ is a constant vector,
$m>0$, and$r=|\vec{r}|$. The integral is over an infinite volume. It's certainly possible by other means, but IBP takes two lines.pic.twitter.com/FKnukHOYDX
-
I never said it would be the most convenient :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.