Note that in the last line at the very left, it should read 1+1/x^4, not 1/x^2. Luckily the inequality still holds in either case.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Problem: lower bound is 1 not 0.
-
Indeed, there are a couple typos that I noted in the comments
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No, statement about finite beer but infinite surface confuses math reality (infinite) with physical reality (bounded). Physical reality has lower constraints on fundamental particle scale. Mathematicians should stop make these confusing statements, they sound funny.
-
Of course I don't think that this could have a physical reality, just like Banach-Tarski--I'm not a mathematical realist. However, these are "mathematical beer mugs" for which the statement is simply accurate. So, I disagree with your philosophical stance on this.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
In the last step to compute the Area the logarithm lower extreme should be a “1” not a “0”, I think...
-
Yes! Thanks for pointing out the typo
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I assume you're referring to the beer analogy
End of conversation
-
-
-
In your last line, at the very left, shouldn't it be 1+1/x^4 ? f'(x) = -1/x^2.
-
Nice catch! Yes it should be. Luckily the inequality still holds for that case as well.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.