Now that I think about it, it's rather counterintuitive (to me) that the radial solutions get quantized as well.. That's quite an amazing fact
-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr @Quantensalat
Is it because we impose normalization? So for the hydrogen atom we insist that the polynomial in the series solution must terminate at some highest order, and the same thing for Hermite polynomial in the harmonic oscillator
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @M7ger @Quantensalat
The fact that the series terminates isn’t normalization.. the fact that the series terminates comes from the boundary conditions at infinity
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @Quantensalat
But isn’t that just a necessary condition for normalization? Thanks for sharing these nice stuff
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @M7ger @Quantensalat
Ah, I see what you’re saying. We usually say that it’s imposing the wave function not blow up at infinity is a condition for normalizABILITY.. that is the wave function must live in some Hilbert space
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I was going to say "finite boundary conditions" as a more descriptive alternative to what I assumed you meant by comoactness. Just apply periodic ones to the atom and you get your radial solutions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
What do you mean by periodicity in the radial solutions?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
On a very basic Bohr-y level, the orbit is a circle, so the wf is subject to a periodic boundary condition. At a distance 2 pi r, the wf must repeat to avoid destructively interfering itself away. Wavelengths work that satisfy this AND the wavelength describes the corresponding E
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I agree that the angular part of the Hamiltonian is quantized since it’s solved over a compact region, but the radial solutions that describe the radial probabilities are something you can’t get from the Bohr model or come from periodicity
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Come on, we gotta get this solved - let's start in 1d. I beliebe there's always a symm. bound state if you have a local dip im the potential <0 and V=0 outside. So what's the mathematical criterion, exponential decay of the wave due to E<V acts like a boundary?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I think the difficult part of all this is making precise the idea of “acting like a boundary”
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.