I think of the Past Hypothesis as "entropy was low at the beginning of our observable universe.” It's definitely true, but it would be great if we could *derive* it without explicitly violating time symmetry, rather than simply postulating it.https://twitter.com/PhilSciArchive/status/1083832934618951680 …
The Schrödinger equation does obey T-symmetry, so the time evolution of a state would obey it.. the fact that the measurement collapses a wave function at some later time doesn’t imply that time has a preferred direction
-
-
For instance if you start in a position eigenstate, let it evolve in time, and then measure the momentum.. there’s no reason why you can’t run time backwards and go from a p to an x eigenstate instead.. they are both valid physical processes
-
Do there are valid physical process which instantaneously change a particle from an eigenstate into a superposition state?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I agree with the first part but don’t understand the second. Are you saying that a measurement leading to wave function collapse should not be considered part of the evolution of the system in time? (I am not a physicist so have little more than a pop-sci understanding of this.)
-
That’s right.. If you continually measure a particle’s observable (position, momentum, spin etc) it will not evolve in time.. it’s known as the quantum Zeno paradox
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.