When I last checked, none of those perfectly nice comments had anything to do with what *I* meant by the classical spin-1/2 particle. So, I decided to explain it here:https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2018/12/30/geometric-quantization-part-5/ …
Update: Some great discussion came about from my http://physics.SE post regarding "classical spinors" (of course @johncarlosbaez 's replies were extremely insightful as well, but to be fair he only had 140 characters to work with)https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/450899/what-precisely-is-a-classical-spin-1-2-particle …
-
-
-
@johncarlosbaez did you see the accepted answer by@knzhou ? It at least *seemed* to me that he was pretty close to what you were saying, but the only way I can know for sure is to give your post a read :) - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.