Watson

Such as menstruation. So we are suggesting that bathrooms etc should be segregated by whether you are capable of periods? Because if so, there's a lot of cisgender women who will also be considered not female enough to piss in peace.

How about vaginas? Well that not only would include many transgender women and thus defeat your own argument. But it also would require genital inspections to be done in order to adequately enforce the rule. Which is creepy and bad.

So if it was going to be either of those I'd probably just explain the flaws in that position. Laugh at you a little for actually thinking it was smart. Then go to bed like I promised I would. Night Watson. Sorry you're transphobic now.

So your argument boils down to “not all women menstruate and have vaginas,” then? Pity. You brought up bathrooms, because of course you did. But it's not just bathrooms. It's sports, prisons, shelters, health provision, counselling for female victims of male abuse and more.

Males and females are different. Our experiences are different, our needs are different, our bodies are different and many women – whether you like it or not – have their reasons for wanting to exclude males from their female spaces. Call me transphobic? No, you're just sexist.

There you go again, just repeating the script and not actually explaining anything at all. For the last time: what needs do cis women have that require trans exclusion? This is sad Watson. I'm sorry you've become this person, truly.

What needs do women have that require trans exclusion? Let's cover sports, prisons, shelters and dating, shall we? 1/6

Sport: The need for fair competition. Male physiology gives a performance advantage that transwomen retain. Males are taller with more muscle, their bones are bigger/stronger in size/density, their arms & legs longer. Males have an advantage in sport regardless of gender ID. 2/6