Watson

The evidence is the screenshots hun. You are making the claim that there are reasons to justify exclusion and discrimination. You're going to need to provide those reasons or else this conversation cannot continue.

Let's just speed run the rest cos it's late and I'm gonna go to bed. The differences between cisgender women and transgender women rest on having a body likely to be assigned female at birth. Which comes with a few differences to the bodies of transgender women...

Such as menstruation. So we are suggesting that bathrooms etc should be segregated by whether you are capable of periods? Because if so, there's a lot of cisgender women who will also be considered not female enough to piss in peace.

How about vaginas? Well that not only would include many transgender women and thus defeat your own argument. But it also would require genital inspections to be done in order to adequately enforce the rule. Which is creepy and bad.

So if it was going to be either of those I'd probably just explain the flaws in that position. Laugh at you a little for actually thinking it was smart. Then go to bed like I promised I would. Night Watson. Sorry you're transphobic now.

So your argument boils down to “not all women menstruate and have vaginas,” then? Pity. You brought up bathrooms, because of course you did. But it's not just bathrooms. It's sports, prisons, shelters, health provision, counselling for female victims of male abuse and more.

Males and females are different. Our experiences are different, our needs are different, our bodies are different and many women – whether you like it or not – have their reasons for wanting to exclude males from their female spaces. Call me transphobic? No, you're just sexist.

There you go again, just repeating the script and not actually explaining anything at all. For the last time: what needs do cis women have that require trans exclusion? This is sad Watson. I'm sorry you've become this person, truly.