Watson

My accusations aren't unfounded, I literally provided the evidence as I made the claims. What specific needs to cisgender women have that would require - nay, justify discrimination and the exclusion of transgender women? So far, it hasn't been tested in law. So take a swing!

I didn't see any evidence, feel free to provide some. Women are female. They have female needs that males do not have and you know this. I won't spell out the basics for you - you're not stupid and you know exactly why women don't want male people in their female spaces.

The evidence is the screenshots hun. You are making the claim that there are reasons to justify exclusion and discrimination. You're going to need to provide those reasons or else this conversation cannot continue.

Let's just speed run the rest cos it's late and I'm gonna go to bed. The differences between cisgender women and transgender women rest on having a body likely to be assigned female at birth. Which comes with a few differences to the bodies of transgender women...

Such as menstruation. So we are suggesting that bathrooms etc should be segregated by whether you are capable of periods? Because if so, there's a lot of cisgender women who will also be considered not female enough to piss in peace.

How about vaginas? Well that not only would include many transgender women and thus defeat your own argument. But it also would require genital inspections to be done in order to adequately enforce the rule. Which is creepy and bad.

So if it was going to be either of those I'd probably just explain the flaws in that position. Laugh at you a little for actually thinking it was smart. Then go to bed like I promised I would. Night Watson. Sorry you're transphobic now.

So your argument boils down to “not all women menstruate and have vaginas,” then? Pity. You brought up bathrooms, because of course you did. But it's not just bathrooms. It's sports, prisons, shelters, health provision, counselling for female victims of male abuse and more.