@CareQualityComm I don't remember your report saying anything about the Tavistock being some evil medical experiment or recommending that they they should abandon medical treatment for trans youth could you clarify?
-
-
Replying to @MelodyDickens @cwknews and
Indeed from what I read one of the issues was that the waiting time vulnerable young peoples access to treatment was v long not that they're receiving it easily and shouldn't be.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @MelodyDickens @cwknews and
Did you skip over "Staff’s assessments of patients were unstructured, inconsistent and poorly recorded, “ the CQC said. "it was not possible to clearly understand from the records why these [clinical] decisions had been made.”
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @eilidhfife @cwknews and
I must have skipped something I don't recall seeing
@CareQualityComm describing trans health care as a medical experimentation scandal at all.1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @MelodyDickens @eilidhfife and
Did you even read the report? Just because the term "medical experimentation" wasn't used doesn't mean that's not what the Tavi's been doing. If you do read the report, it's pretty clear that's what's been going on there.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ImWatson91 @eilidhfife and
I really don't think that the
@CareQualityComm is transphobic or support any of the values transgender trend, or as she's also known: stephanie davies Arai, are spouting or think that trans kids just recieving treatment is a medical experimentation scandal.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MelodyDickens @eilidhfife and
It's very clear from CQCs findings that this is a medical scandal.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ImWatson91 @eilidhfife and
Is this your view
@CareQualityComm ?1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MelodyDickens @eilidhfife and
The Staff were found to not manage risk well, their records were not completed in a consistent or structured manner, their assessments of patients were unstructured, inconsistent and poorly recorded, and there was no clear rationale for clinical decision making. 1/4
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ImWatson91 @MelodyDickens and
The records of young people beginning treatment before January 2020 didn't include their capacity, competency and consent, and there were very few details of staff helping young people weigh-up the foreseeable risks and consequences of their treatment 2/4
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
The March 2020 audit reviewed 10 records of young people referred for blockers, of which only 3 contained a completed consent form/checklist for referral. The staff did not assess the capacity and competency of young people despite being fully aware that they had not done so 3/4
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.