Give me one example of them being phobic? Children cannot consent to things with serious long-term consequences. These treatments can effect sexual function, can cause life-long dependence on HRT and can permanently alter and sterilize them. TT are right to urge for caution.
-
-
Replying to @ImWatson91
The tweet I showed you? Saying that trans and by implication gay kids should not be able to access confidential advice without parental knowledge is to gravely injure gay and trans kids. Confidential advice is vital for LGBT kids
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomgabion
That is not phobic. I disagree with them here, but understand their point. They're saying children shouldn't be encouraged online to keep things from their parents. Many, maybe most parents would agree with that. Nothing bigoted there.
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @ImWatson91
So, you don't think gay kids should be able to access confidential advice and support about being gay? How then are you not advocating for gay kids to be outed to their parents against their will?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomgabion
Read my tweet again. I literally said "I disagree with them here." But I don't label everyone I disagree with as bigoted.
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @ImWatson91 @tomgabion
yes. People are misusing the words bigot and phobia (also plenty of other words). The meanings of words matter. If we don't agree on a definition we might as well be speaking to each other in different languages. (Sadly, some people encourage this for political purposes).
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @BitterTonic @ImWatson91
In what way is seeking to deny gay kids access to confidential information, thereby outing them to their parents, not homophobic?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomgabion @BitterTonic
You're twisting the topic. This was about TT criticising Mermaids for encouraging trans kids - not gay kids - to keep information from their parents. TT has never said gay kids must out themselves to their parents. Not once.
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @ImWatson91 @BitterTonic
But they are. The universal statement "No organisation should be encouraging children to hide their internet viewing from their parents. No children's charity should be undermining parents & assisting children to go behind their backs." Applies to gay charities as well
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Have they clarified they don't mean gay charities? They have not. Have they apologised? They have now. So I conclude that they mean what they say and they are homophobic bigots
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Alright, let's ask them. @Transgendertrd would you object to a gay child having access to sites that offer support to gay kids without their potentially homophobic parents knowledge?
-
-
No we wouldn't. They are not giving advice about medical interventions, they are not dealing with medical matters. The point is Mermaids is not a support group for children with gender dysphoria, they are a group that lobbies for early medical intervention.
2 replies 1 retweet 35 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.