1/x A few threaded thoughts/highlights on @MerriamWebster's excellent choice of "They" as their #WordOfTheYearhttps://twitter.com/MerriamWebster/status/1204374900393304064 …
-
Show this thread
-
2/x As MW says, that "they" has never meant the singular form is ahistorical: "English famously lacks a gender-neutral singular pronoun to correspond neatly w singular pronouns like everyone or someone, and as a consequence they has been used for this purpose for over 600 years.
2 replies 29 retweets 123 likesShow this thread -
3/x Language means what its users determine it means. Clearly, they/them has taken on potent contemporary uses, which is great. Those wanting to not acknowledge what these words now convey are just salty about giving up the power to dictate the language.
4 replies 33 retweets 127 likesShow this thread -
4/x A philosophical question I have mulled since I took Julie Livingston's A History of the Body class: Why am I "I" singular anyway, when my body is amassed with millions of bacteria without which "I" would die almost immediately? Must "I" consider my living ecosystem singular?
3 replies 9 retweets 73 likesShow this thread -
5/x Then, there's
@TheLivingMJ's philosophical riff on@PhizLair and Douglas Hofstadter: "I 'I' is just an illusion, then what a strange loop!" So, they/them. Less American individualism. More conceptual community identity. Acknowledge connection . Less binary. Yay.11 replies 7 retweets 85 likesShow this thread
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.