Watson

Should we create our own study? Inthink these numbers are being blocked my those of the trans agenda because they do not want this information to get out

The “trans agenda” lord If doctors knew the rate of detransitioning was high they’d publish it instantly. You don’t think they want any excuse to deny us HRT/SRS? There isn’t some trans agenda bogeyman stopping knowledge from being published.

There’s money to be made in the massive increase of people flocking to gender clinics. The blockers and hormones being given to transitioners make companies like Ferring Pharmaceuticals a lot of money.https://twitter.com/JeanHatchet/status/1202901925777346561 …

Is there money to be made for doctors conducting malpractice? Doctors have historically pushed low E, high AA transitions (very ineffective) for mtf due to a perceived notion of lower risk of blood clots (later dispelled). They’re far more concerned for their own licenses

The number of FTMs (including myself) who were not informed that long-term testosterone use could result in vaginal atrophy could be malpractice, yet I haven’t seen any these clinics being called out. Not one lawsuit.

Did you approach an informed consent clinic? And you signed a form saying you were aware of the consequences and effects of transition?

I did. During the discussion of risks with my psychiatrist he mentioned acne, hairloss, deepening voice etc. He did not mentioned atrophy. I was not informed that that was a possibility.

That’s interesting. Last I heard there weren’t informed consent clinics in the UK and you had to go through the NHS with wait times from 2-3 years.