Now I want to know why a higher ratio male authors in a replication study makes it more likely to 'succeed' 
Correlates of replicating: effect size, p-value, power, ratio of male authors, economics discipline Correlates of not replicating: social psychology discipline, # of authors, interaction effects, not compensating Ps, not having a professor co-author https://osf.io/preprints/bitss/zamry/ …pic.twitter.com/uUExPK9qJW
-
-
-
As do I!
-
probably just a counfound of econ/cognitive psych having more men than social psych and replicating more often *in the dataset*
-
Oh yeah there's some fairly straightforward 3rd variable answers. But it made me giggle nonetheless.
-
(Although of course if it were just discipline based, there'd be a male-bias in the original papers too - (O) - rather than just the replication attempts (R))
-
This may seem a bit harsh but could it simply be women are often hired for their diversity as opposed to their talent? I work in physics which is one of the most gender skewed disciplines. High prestige institutions regularly have women over represented relative to the field...
-
... this leads to very different average skill levels between male and female workers at these institutions. I suspect the same effect is present in other male dominated disciplines, but to a lesser degree.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And then there is this:
@AlexJonesPhD, “Using natural language processing to predict replicability of psychological science”https://github.com/alexjonesphd/nlp-replication …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nature reminding us females should think more about replication.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.