One of the best "own goals" ever. Even the UN called it Judea and Samaria in 1948 documents. You guys make it too easy for me.
-
-
-
Oh, and please teach everyone how calling the city Jerusalem instead of Al Quds is racist. Can you please publish the entire series already?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Please, do one on Palestinian currency. And the Palestine exhibit at the World's Fair. And the Palestine Orchestra.
-
The can also add the Palestine Post, while they're at it.
-
And the Palestine-Australia football match
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are so wrong. It was only named “West Bank” by Jordan in 1950. Prior to that, the UN partition plan referred to it as "the hill country of Samaria and Judea.” Please issue a correction.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Actually Jordan gave it a the name “West Bank” after the independence war when they illegally occupied it. But, hey, no one is expecting INN to be honest.
-
Looks like another ratio for IfNotNow.

-
I mean they’ve literally stopped using facts all together.
-
Who cares about facts, when you can't read or use logic. You would get further arguing/reasoning with a snail than with the people (if we can call them that) at INN.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No, it's called Judea and Samaria. The only time it was called the West Bank was during the Jordanian occupation from 1949 - 1967.
-
Some fools think that history has a statute of limitations defined by the Arabs, and that conquest thru war is ok, as long as Jews didn't do it (even in a defensive war). Selective perception (or lack thereof).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
More ignorant statements from IfNotNow. West Bank came from 1948-49 Jordanian occupation of the area. Today both terms can be used without rejecting the legitimacy of the other. Stop trying to divide people.
-
Hmmm, education or lack thereof.
https://twitter.com/vicenews/status/1078382509732155392?s=21 …
1:15 -
That 66% of millennials is IfNotNow’s source for recruitment of future members.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fakest thing
@IfNotNow ever claimed, it is YOU who spreads misinformation! No one in the world referred to it as WB until 60s. WB is not a name; it’s a description. Native peoples have names for their lands. Even UN called it JUDea/Samaria in their 1947 Partition Plan. -
That they use the descriptive term “West Bank” to describe land extending dozens of miles in from the bank of a river is proof that their claim is bullshit.
-
Ironically, among the few nations/peoples who accepted this illegal annexation, the most interesting one is the PLO, whose 1964 Charter cedes sovereignty of the "West Bank" to Jordan. In other words, the PLO history of the region is absolute fiction, according to the PLO itself.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.