Here's the link to the FCC filings, thanks to @TylerG1998 for spotting them! https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/reports/STA_Print.cfm?mode=current&application_seq=93066&RequestTimeout=1000 …
Show this thread
@SpaceX has updated the droneship FCC filings for STP-2. OCISLY will be stationed approximately 1240km (!!) downrange from KSC. This will be *even further* than Arabsat's center core landing (which was only 967km).
The purpose of this change is not known.
Keep cool, B1057.pic.twitter.com/twS1wDKuxT
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
SpaceX just want to never get a core booster back...
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Landing in the Bermuda triangle?
-
Yes, but they’ve done it before ;)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They realized they could fly Zuma 2.0 along with everything else and just call it "ballast"
-
I'm always thought zuma 2.0 would be him launching another car *wink*
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why is the landing so far out at sea now? It was supposed to be just off the coast originally.
@elonmusk -
No it wasn't, center core of FH doesn't boostback burn ...
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If the payload could be launched in a slightly northerly inclination they could try to land in Bermuda. Wouldn't put it past SpaceX to experiment with that someday, if the Bermuda authorities would let them build a landing pad in a remote part of that island...hmm
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.