Ian DuntVerified account

try as I might, I literally cannot come up with a sentence more Orwellian / doublespeak than your tweet.

You're clearly not very imaginative.

@OpheliaBenson A private company censoring voices they don't like on an ostensibly public platform is a net gain for free speech?

You could use the same empty phrase of mobs shouting "Niggers out!!" at schoolchildren, but it would be stupid.

What exactly did Milo say that was remotely like an actual mob hurling racist insults at nearby children?

Many things, over however many thousands of tweets.

Evidence for that? Nothing I've read of his comes anywhere near close.

Tons of evidence. Do I have time & inclination to collect it? No. But if you were a woman maybe it would strike you differently.

you don't have any

Any what?

@Bonn1eGreer you do not understand the definition of free speech.

the answer to bad speech is more speech. Not preventing someone from speaking. This is how a police state starts.

It's their website. Their rules. #Twitter

of course it is. They aren't subject to 1st amendment But it's anti free speech. I'm surprised youre saying otherwise.

I'm surprised you're wasting time on this. Good day to you.

I understand why people feel this way but I can't agree.Free Speech isn't about protecting what you want to hear.

It's twitter's site and they can define it they way they like.

Can't argue with that. Twitter can indeed do as they please. I do oppose entrenching idiots however.