Never write a word about affordance until stopping to consider a few things about actions.
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
An action is an event that happens over time. Anything can happen between start and end; the completion does not necessarily follow initiation.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
An ' 'opportunity' for action' is thus -always- -speculative- in some sense.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Any notion of 'picking up' or 'perceiving' or otherwise coming to understand that there 'exists' an 'opportunity for action' is to hold a -speculation- about what is -possible- -to initiate-.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Any feature of the world that engenders this understanding engenders a speculation about what can be.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
If a feature was -necessarily- connected to what the future -will- be it'd mean time was broken or that you could l i t e r a l y see the future.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Ok, now you can -start- trying to think about affordances (if only the original Gibsonian one ). It starts with sweeping all the above under the rug for convenience. And that's not even where things -really- go off the rails.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
I think everyone thought I was going to push Gibson’s ‘action and perception’ are linked bit; but what I’m saying is you need to start with a standard account of action to judge what various affordance concepts actually get you explanation wise, and at what cost.
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.