Okay, if this is the game now, let's play. This nonsense works both ways. Please explain why it doesn't harm the broader @YouTube community when Samantha Bee calls Ivanka Trump a "feckless c***," when Colbert calls Trump a "c*** holster" for Vladimir Putin.https://twitter.com/TeamYouTube/status/1136341801109843968 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @benshapiro @YouTube
See, this is why I would never put my entire career at the mercy of
@TeamYouTube like many youtubers do. It’s because their policies don’t really mean anything. If they don’t like you, they’ll demonitize you and legally there’s nothing you can do about it.19 replies 96 retweets 803 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Hate speech is not protected under the first amendment.
42 replies 0 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @ILikeBonhoeffer @RobBowlinThe3rd and
Spoiler: the very point of the first amendment is that it IS protected
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I disagree with the point of the first amendment being that hate speech is protected (it's that Congress can't create laws to forbid certain speech), BUT I did admit that my original statement was wrong in a later tweet. :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.