Urbanists (who culturally & economically are usually pretty left-leaning) & free market public interest lawyers (who culturally are all over the place, but economically are, obvs., not left-leaning) both, rightly, believe that land use & zoning are screwed up. 5/
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
There’s a question for each group. That for the free market public interest lawyers is why aren’t you suing about it? (Some are, but not many) They’ll tell you it’s because in Euclid v. Amber Realty (1926) the Supreme Court said “you will lose.” And they’re right! Almost . . . 6/
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
The same was true in other civil rights movements, but that didn’t stop people from suing. One method has been to use state constitutions. I speculate that maybe why that hasn’t happened more on housing issues is b/c of fallout from the Mount Laurel litigation in NJ. 7/
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
I give some reasons why Mount Laurel shouldn’t mean we don’t have litigation in other states. And, indeed, if things go well perhaps we could even go back to federal courts one of these days. 8/
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
The question for urbanists is why aren’t you getting together w/ lawyers to encourage this litigation? I think it’s because they’re, understandably, not very familiar w/ the circle of property rights lawyers, like my colleagues at IJ, who do this sort of thing, & our language. 9/
1 proslijeđeni tweet 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
They know about cases like Euclid or Kelo, but don’t “speak property rights public interest law.” And they don’t need to, but they do need to get to know those who do. 10/
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
So here’s the point of the post & this thread—we need urbanists & free market public interest lawyers to learn from each other about how we can advance through constitutional litigation the civil rights cause of building more housing. 11/
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
I’m not exactly sure how we do that (maybe we talk to each other on Twitter? A conference? Cocktail hours?), but if the result of it will be constitutional challenges to restrictions on providing housing for people it’ll be time well spent. 12/
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
I should end by noting I’m very much one of the property rights lawyers, they’re the people I’ve associated w/ for a long time now. But I do know a few urbanists & know we have a lot in common. Learning from them has vastly improved my outlook on land-use policy. 13/
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Tagging just a few urbanists & property rights lawyers (& journalists) to (1) invite them to glance at my post & (2) maybe get to know each other more.
@SonjaTrauss@hanlonbt@lrichardsCNU@clmarohn@strongtowns@cityobs@Richard_Florida@MarketUrbanism 14/1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
@BlakeTrask @ConorDougherty @mnolangray @ebwhamilton @schmangee @jenny_schuetz @emilymbadger @JoshWindham1 @paulmsherman @No_Treason_6 @thehottot @TimothySandefur @Anastasia_esq @CMM123 @wenfa1 @RickEsenberg @ishapiro @JustinDOwen 15/end
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @IJSanders @BlakeTrask i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Obviously I'm highly sympathetic to this, but I think it must be emphasized that organizations such as
@PacificLegal have been doing that litigation for half a century now & while they've accomplished a lot of good, it's been like trying to mop the sand off the beach, because1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @TimothySandefur @IJSanders i sljedećem broju korisnika:
1 The left, esp the envt'l left, ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT support any effort that might benefit the evil rich property owning bourgeois meanies. (If the left were in good faith they'd've long ago opposed rent control) 2 The right is still so wedded to "judicial restraint" that
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa - Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.