But we have a long way to go. It’s basically a civil rights movement & is still pretty new. And although what it’s done so far has been very promising, there’s something it’s missing that past civil rights movements have used: constitutional public interest litigation. 3/
I should end by noting I’m very much one of the property rights lawyers, they’re the people I’ve associated w/ for a long time now. But I do know a few urbanists & know we have a lot in common. Learning from them has vastly improved my outlook on land-use policy. 13/
-
-
Tagging just a few urbanists & property rights lawyers (& journalists) to (1) invite them to glance at my post & (2) maybe get to know each other more.
@SonjaTrauss@hanlonbt@lrichardsCNU@clmarohn@strongtowns@cityobs@Richard_Florida@MarketUrbanism 14/Prikaži ovu nit
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The short answer to your question below is that
@SonjaTrauss and I co-founded@YIMBY_Law, which sues cities all the time. I don't think constitutional property-rights suits are the most effective approach to achieving our goals.https://twitter.com/IJSanders/status/1181278308803047425?s=20 … -
Yes, you guys do great work! & as I say in my post, using statutory challenges is important. My point is that, long-term, civil rights movements achieve the most change thru constitutional litigation. I could be wrong, but it's my read of the history.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.