(4/4) Even if a video remains on our site, it doesn’t mean we endorse/support that viewpoint. There are other aspects of the channel that we’re still evaluating– we’ll be in touch with any further updates.
-
-
Replying to @TeamYouTube @gaywonk
Update on our continued review–we have suspended this channel’s monetization. We came to this decision because a pattern of egregious actions has harmed the broader community and is against our YouTube Partner Program policies. More here:https://yt.be/help/xLtT
4,286 replies 221 retweets 2,433 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube @gaywonk
Awesome. Demands a channel gets eradicated because he feels threatened, while simultaneously inciting others to throw milkshakes at people. Cuz equality and stuff.
7 replies 16 retweets 291 likes -
Maybe I'm nuts.. but he asked YouTube to hold Crowder to their OWN printed policies and ethical standards.. Carlos said his stupid stuff about milkshakes on an entirely DIFFERENT platform that tbh should feel free to hold him to THEIR policies.. but it was said outside of YouTube
5 replies 0 retweets 108 likes -
Replying to @AnoniStef @JackLCreative and
You're not nuts, just gullible. Literally every claim he made about Crowder was a lie. If you cared about the truth, you'd take 5 minutes and see that for yourself.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IFact82 @JackLCreative and
I've watched Crowder's stuff. He says those things and often seems to participate/ encourage harassment of minorities. Literally sells a shirt with f*g printed on it? Kinda sounds like he's breaking YouTubes policies
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AnoniStef @IFact82 and
Honestly, a lot of people with a platform do this pretty regularly. My bigger point is that, if you shut down other peoples’ speech, then they can do the same to you. That’s why unpopular speech is protected; popular speech doesn’t need protecting.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JackLCreative @IFact82 and
Tbh I'm all for protecting free speech, but I'm pretty sure hate speech isn't covered under that? That's why there are laws against it. I like hearing most people's perspectives even if I don't agree with them but calling minorities f*g isn't really contributing.. its just hate.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AnoniStef @JackLCreative and
"Fig" is hate? Really? Kid, you really haven't thought anything through and have a LOT of growing up to do. You're too young to realize how you"re being controlled
#groupthink and have yet to learn how to be a#FreeThinker. Vox targets people like you to use as puppets.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IFact82 @JackLCreative and
You're playing along pretending that the term being used is "fig" but you think I'm the one being controlled? I literally don't watch Vox and I do think for myself. That's what led me to the "Abusing another human for just existing is wrong maybe that shouldn't be done" thoughts.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Crowder didn't attack him for being different. He posts videos debunking the outlandish claims Vox and Carlos make daily. A Vox writers have called for physical violence against anyone attending a speaking event and bragged about spreading misinformation regarding Trump
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.