JAVA or C# would also be close, and there are good reasons to prefer those over C++ for servers. Many other languages would also be up there, the contrast is with Really Slow (but often productive and fun) languages.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Sorry john, but this is a stupid tweet. judge by yourself : a data point at least 10 years old, based on second hand info and used in a blanket statement.
-
This is in the context that I am using python daily now in the AI space. Lots of things are great, but actually executing a lot of python code, as opposed to stringing together invocations of native code, is quite slow.
- Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Morals of this story: 1. Always use the most performant language available to you. (What if your program gets a few million users?) 2. Horizontal scalability is too much complexity/work. Just apply the correct amount of optimization when you initially write the code.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
compiled languages make a big difference. Quake 2 in .net was 70% of the performance of hand optimized assembly https://blog.codinghorror.com/on-managed-code-performance/ … .. and that was in 2005
-
there are far more places where thread /memory safety is more important than raw speed, than the other way around. If you need more speed, wait a few moths for Moore's law to catch your problem up, or offload it to a Cloud
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
What do you think of Rust being the new replacement of C/C++?
-
Why do languages that work need to be replaced?
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.