Correct. Even though there is some plausibility for #LabLeak, the arguments being made for #LabLeakTheory currently bear all of the hallmarks of a conspiracy theory.https://twitter.com/thebirdmaniac/status/1404550561232531471 …
So, given that there is also not any compelling evidence of non-lab origin, it would be appropriate to ridicule the zoonotic origin zealots? (Or we could be civil and just not ridicule eachother but nah... too mature for you I guess)
-
-
If by "non-lab origin" you mean "not engineered or modified in a lab" then it's false to say there's no compelling evidence supporting that hypothesis. If you mean "did not get collected by a lab and then accidentally released by same lab", the question is whether there ever 1/
-
COULD BE "compelling evidence" to prove a negative. Can you provide "compelling evidence" that you have never murdered anyone? 2/
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Even lab-leak supporters believe in zoonotic origin (which then was modified in a lab). If you claim there is "not any compelling evidence of non-lab origin," you're really far out there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
fire is tasty