(1) Wait, they are? (2) If they are, I suspect we're not 'letting them', as we have no control over it. It's the administration that is in charge there.
Dear philosophy departments: why are we allowing non-philosophy departments to teach most of the continental philosophy?
-
-
-
This was intended as a facetious observation that emphasizes the prima facie oddity by which other departments seem to teach more continental philosophy than do philosophy departments.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Rorty finished his career in a department of comparative literature. I think this tells a lot about how comfortable he must have felt in philosophy departments.
-
It's rather a sign of being rejected by them. In fact Rorty didn't teach in a philosophy dept after PMN was published. That book made him persona non grata amongst professional philosophers.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Because most philosophy departments don't bother talking about: - race - gender - literature - technology - history outside philosophy - any contemporary social criticism
-
I'm not sure I agree. Every ethics class I've ever taken discussed those issues. We just tend to not do it using the continental philosophers because they're largely inscrutable to everyone who doesn't specialize in them. That's my best guess.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Short answer: McCarthyism. McCumber’s book is a researched written account of how Continental + Marx got systematically denied from Phil deptspic.twitter.com/Nv1jvOI85p
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is honestly a big problem
-
we live in anglo land so we can only do it through an anglo lense
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.