1.6%? Seems low
Our @pollsterpolls model gives @HillaryClinton a 98.1% chance of winning the presidency http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2016/forecast/president …pic.twitter.com/RcNnoTqdke
-
-
-
high, i meant, seems high. grrr.
-
WOW! How wrong you elites were! You did not get how bad
#Hillary was -
sarcasm is just lost on some people huh?
-
Unable to tell based on your timeline and since you deleted tweets from before Nov 27.
-
what? No i didn't. Maybe something is wrong with your Internet connection. I mean, my pinned tweet is from June, of 2015
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hoping this teaches us all about relying on polls.
@HuffingtonPost@pollsterpolls put HRC winning w 98%. WRONG! Cell phones never polled. -
The numbers where there in the internals. Most just refused to make the correct conclusions and used 2012 #'s.
-
yep. But instead of honest analysis I’m afraid political bias (and incredulity that Trump could ever win) took over
-
Guy I have been following the last few weeks had the internals nailed. He was dead on and explained why.
@mitchellvii -
He is the BEST.
-
I'll check out this person. Thanks!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hey guys, maybe you're in the wrong business:
@HuffingtonPost@pollsterpolls@HillaryClintonpic.twitter.com/xtLx9Oe6Dn
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wow guys. You really suck as pollsters, don't you?
-
still crying?
-
No. Laughing now.
-
still stunned myself, and still believe that hillary is going to pull this out, tbh
-
Hey, Ace. It's pudding time.
-
No no -- it's too soon for pudding...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.