This is such a bunch of baloney. In its current form, Solana is just as centralised as BSC. The top 12 validators have the cumulative power to halt the network. The decentralization buck pretty much stops with btc and eth. It's futile pretending otherwise.https://twitter.com/RyanWatkins_/status/1381421864472436740 …
-
-
@IDrawCharts thoughts? -
as far as centralization, yeah, accurate but the top 3 mining pools control 51% of bitcoin, the top 3 eth mining pools control 51% of ethereum so it's a kinda shitty argument. And yeah, there's a million more farms on BSC rn, so it makes sense to put a lot more capital there
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Glad someone smarter than me agrees
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
who is it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they put that $1.6b in Solana, that will kill the Raydium yield and render it less attractive. That's why they don't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When do we buy sushi
mateThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1) what matters is the vector of this figure over time, not the current spot number 2) Bitcoin and ethereum mining pools thresholds are a lot lower than 12 3) the same argument that applies to mining pools being Comprised of many small miners applies to Solana validators
-
Ser do we have statistics on what % of validators have either a) received funds from Solana Foundation, or b) are part of the Solana Foundation delegation program? In other words, what % of validators are truly independnet of the Solana Foundation?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

