Damn, this is quite based from CZ. Using their insurance fund to recompensate traders who lost money on COVERs fuck up and aren't part of the recompensation plan. There was really no reason for them to do this.https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1344482356074225664 …
-
-
>Exchange doesn't refund: Oh wow, how greedy, CEX bad Do people expect exchanges to cover token collapses like this? I certainly never have but I'm also not much of a CEX user, and yeah it's a good move but it's CZ, he'll always get something out of it, just being realistic
-
No, there's no precedent for it. ETC gets 51% attacked all the time. Why I said there was no reason for them to do so. Just feels like it was pretty neat that they did, even though it's good PR. Everything doesn't have to be some evil ulterior motive play.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Agree. There are several reasons to criticize CZ but compensating the users is not one whatever the motive may be.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
agreed, we're all quick to criticise
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
