Machine man

@HrTomnielsen

Core values: Intellectual honesty, Integrity, Civility. Me in two words: Skeptic, Coder.

Feel free to disagree with me.
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2017.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @HrTomnielsen

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @HrTomnielsen

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    21. stu 2019.

    For those who didn't catch Schiff's closing statement live. Here it is. This is important. You NEED to watch it:

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 19 sati

    We're not seriously falling for this shit again, right?

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Unless the 4 wavering GOPs join all 47 Dems in voting for censure, with McConnell giving them license to do so, Manchin’s censure move could serve only to give him and Jones cover to acquit, yielding a 55-45 acquittal margin and no majority to censure, the worst possible outcome.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 17 sati

    Opening arguments then no witnesses then closing arguments. That’s not a trial. The Constitution requires a trial. Chief Justice Roberts must declare a mistrial. Impeachment trial of President Trump: Live updates

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 21 sat

    Everyone should ask themselves why the entire GOP is rooting for Bernie to get the nomination. Spoiler: it’s not 12 dimensional chess. They’re scared of the rest of the candidates.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    This is so jaw droppingly bold that I am almost impressed.

    Tweet je nedostupan.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    Also, do you think Bolton didn’t know his co-conspirators would never allow his testimony? When he wouldn’t even testify to the House? He’s selling a book and trustwashing his bad acts.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    welcome to america where the only way to get witnesses for an impeachment trial is if it’s because the president got a blowjob

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    If new evidence—like Bolton's actual book—comes out later, they can just blame it on the House Dems not being "thorough," leaving aside their own head-in-the-sand culpability and the willful obstruction from the White House that obviously slowed & blocked such evidence now....

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    GOP: Instead of ending Trump’s presidency, which he cheated in an election to win, for trying to cheat in another election, we should let that election, which we’re not punishing him for trying to cheat in so he has no incentive not to cheat in it, decide his fate.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    That would be a shame if some evidence came out after they vote to not hear from witnesses but before they can acquit Drumpf. That would be some unfortunate timing right there...

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    This. Get in front of a microphone Treason Tache.

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    OK, Security Geeks, What's wrong with this image that Trump tweeted?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    a play in four acts

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    With lots of talk about a possible 50-50 tie vote on witnesses, I went back to the Andrew Johnson impeachment trial - and I did find where the Chief Justice broke a tie vote

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    He shot EVERYBODY on 5th Avenue. 😪

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    "There are legitimate ways to have an investigation conducted...but under no circumstances do you go outside your legitimate law enforcement process to ask a foreign power to investigate your rival," Schiff says responding to question from Graham and Cruz.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Lev Parnas' activities get illuminated here. Gregg is a great person to follow & knows key people. He also echoes what Chuck Rosenberg said today- the SDNY is not compromised- there are over 1000 people who are not politically motivated, doing their jobs right.

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Don't know if "Biden is in trouble," but let's play 'What If ?' What If Trump is convicted in the Senate, or resigns ? What If the GOP contender is Pence or TBD ? How does that affect Dem primaries ? Does Biden's electability argument evaporate ? Is the race wide open again ?

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    is correct that motive *is* relevant in most criminal cases *and* in most civil cases. If you are fired from your job, it's not necessarily illegal unless, for example, the motive was race. The argument that POTUS cannot be removed based on motive is dead wrong.

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    10. Senator Schumer unsure if Parnas will be allowed in the gallery because of the electronic ankle bracelet however his office provided tickets to Parnas & Attorney

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·