"Net zero" is so deceptive. Net means we could increase fossil fuel output as long as we offset it. I really don't want to see that word in front of zero ever.
#BidenBelieves "net zero" by 2050 is viable.
We know it's not.
We need zero emissions by 2030.
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
doesn't matter what he believes if his actions are just more republicanism
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
After replacing 1 of our 2 cars with a used e-car, our family went from weekly gas station visits to once every 2-3 months
-
What kind of car?
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Gonna need nuclear to get there that fast
-
No thank you just look at what happened in Japan many times. The last one was in 2011 and experts even said that it can get even worst in the next 10 years if they don’t ban nuclear energy
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
He said itll take until 2035
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Nobody is listening
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.