I wish they'd let @RepAdamSchiff answer most, if not all of the questions. He is by far the best orator and therefore, the most persuasive. I kind of cringe hearing some of others speak. Adam doesn't need to read notes. He just speaks.
-
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Dershowitz made no sense in arguing about Quid Pro Quo. He did not address the Quid Pro Quo for personal political benefit, other than saying that since the president’s re-election is in national interest, he has the right to a Quid Pro Quo for personal/political benefit. Nuts!
-
Not only that....his crackpot assertion that presidential abuse of power is not an impeachable offense is beyond preposterous.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Thank goodness we have Adam Schiff!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
@RepAdamSchiff does not suffer fools!#ImpeachmentHearingsHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
It has been glaringly obvious that Chief Justice Roberts refuses to thank and give Manager title reference to both Reps Val Demings and Hakeem Jeffries after their answers today. Wow. I wonder who’s side he’s on? God help us.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.