Looked at the “Plot to Kidnap the Governor of Michigan” FBI affidavit and immediately found exactly what I expected.pic.twitter.com/VucZoqucKa
Show this thread
Charming use of the passive voice here. Gee, I wonder who told the other attendees to leave if they didn’t want to “participate in attacks against the government”? Can’t think of any way to guess!pic.twitter.com/WU3na3kCaJ
-
-
Wow, the guy with the “let’s construct a clearly-ineffective IED together” could have been anyone on that list.pic.twitter.com/OJSa2DyNjH
Show this thread -
What a good friend either CHS-1, CHS-2, UCE-1, or UCE-2 is!pic.twitter.com/vfAl7jE9yB
Show this thread -
The two confidential informants, each of whom is unaware of the other’s status, are trying to entrap each other here lmaopic.twitter.com/3PDErloW5h
Show this thread -
I see this cartoonishly fake plot is back in the news, and I realized I hadn’t finished the first affidavit. That’s the second “everybody who doesn’t jump into the bushes right now gets indicted!” moment. Also, god. Those fucking cop jokes.pic.twitter.com/0aIDWbChUf
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not one of the informants. They have to list those (like they did with "CHS-2") when present. They could be lying! But it's not the lie of omission you're insinuating.
-
if it's not one of the informants then why wouldn't they name who it was in the affidavit? and go after that person?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.