Hillary ClintonVerified account

Surely you do not mean the 110 e-mails, in 52 e-mail chains, that have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received! Our did you forget about those?

I tweeted about those that were classified at the time they were transmitted. Look at my tweet again. Also, as anyone who was a custodian of classified info will tell you, a person in her position must be able to discern if material is classified, material marked or not.

It is not the actual mark “classified/secret/top secret” that makes something classified but the nature/subject matter of the material. It is expected a Secretary of State would know the difference!

You’re useless regurgitation of right wing talking points is sad, old and tired. Trolling a Clinton thread and stirring the pot is obviously more important to you than facts, & truth. Thanks for putting PhD by your name, it reflects your vanity~ appearance is everything right?

If the professor's quote is not fact, then either Hillary or the FBI is confused on the matter of National Defense. Is that an unimportant issue now?

You were such a bad candidate that the people of America felt that voting @realDonaldTrump, with zero political experience, was a better option. Have you sat back and thought about why that is for a minute? I mean, we all know why, but it seems to have gone over your head...

Except that almost 3 million more Americans voted for her than for him...

And if you exclude Texas, Clinton got about 4 million more votes. Which other Americans do you want to exclude?

Apparently these pseudo-Patriots believe in valuing certain Americans over others...I’m glad you showed them the stupidity of their own “logic.” Although, is logic the best word to use for their arguments? probably not.

Sure bringing the popular vote as an argument for an election that is precisely NOT decided this way is logic

So why exactly did you bring up CA voters and not counting their votes? Again...can’t quite call the arguments you make logical.

I agree with you. But the guy was making a totally irrelevant point about the popular vote which has nothing to do with how the presidential election is decided So i have the right to make a totally irrelevant point as well