There are multiple puzzling dynamics at play in options: The options market boasts 100% on-exchange trading but we still see PFOF. Dark pools don't exist but trades are still executed inside the NBBO. The SEC regulates options competition differently from equities. Why?
-
-
There's also the specialist angle to consider. Exchanges choose MMs to act as a specialist for each traded stock. Specialists have higher quoting obligations & in return get even more order flow exclusivity. Who are the top specialists? You guessed it - the top wholesalers.
Show this thread -
So to review, wholesalers pay brokers for order flow & to manage their routing obligations. Exchanges pay wholesalers & give them special trading privileges for their order flow. Double the PFOF, double the fun! What happens if it's banned?
Show this thread -
In my opinion, not much would change at first. Brokers would still route to wholesalers because they don't want to deal with exchange connectivity & routing. They just wouldn't be getting paid PFOF anymore. Wholesalers would CLEAN UP in this scenario.
Show this thread -
Complex exchange connections & rules have given wholesalers a way to insert themselves in the flow of options volume & control immense amounts of power, more so than equities. Banning PFOF won't immediately take that power away. We can't look solely at equities to make policy.
Show this thread -
Thanks for reading - hopefully you learned something from this thread. I'll be doing a deeper dive into options market structure in an upcoming post - sign up below if interested:https://frontmonth.substack.com/
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.