In its decision, the Supreme Court laid out its framework for classifying a security: A security exists when there is an "investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the efforts of others"
-
Show this thread
-
Let's break this down into 4 parts: 1. An investment of money 2. A common enterprise 3. An expectation of profits 4. To be derived from the efforts of others This list is also known as the "Howey Test", and it is the lense through which the SEC views crypto.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Let's apply the Howey Test to crypto lending. 1. An investment of money - this clearly fits. Users give money to others in the form of cryptocurrency. 2. A common enterprise - also pretty clear. Here's the official SEC language supporting this:pic.twitter.com/daSrTCUe9v
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
3. An expectation of profits - Again, pretty convincing for SEC jurisdiction here. I lend my crypto to others because I expect a profit, otherwise why lend? 4. Derived from the efforts of others - this is where ambiguity & political games begin.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
What makes a crypto profit "derived from the efforts of others"? Is it derived from the project's developers? The miners? The borrowers themselves?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
In a June 2018 CNBC interview, SEC Chair Jay Clayton said Bitcoin was NOT a security. "Cryptocurrencies are replacements for sovereign currencies, replace the dollar, the euro, the yen with bitcoin. That type of currency is not a security."https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/06/06/sec-chairman-clayton-says-agency-wont-change-definition-of-a-security.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Okay, but what about other crypto assets? Stablecoins for example? Gary Gensler has been vocal in his opinion that stablecoins ARE securities. "These platforms are implicated by the securities laws and must work within our securities regime."https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/sec-chair-hints-some-stablecoins-are-securities-2021-07-21 …
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Hold on a second there. Bitcoin is treated as a commodity today, putting it under CFTC jurisdiction. Why are stablecoins any different? The CFTC argues, nothing really:pic.twitter.com/oZUQetCeUP
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
The CFTC vs. SEC battle over jurisdiction is far from over, and will get more intense as new crypto use cases form. One such use case is lending, which is where Coinbase enters the equation.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
THE PARENTS MUST TOP FIGHTING. I'm going to a friend's house until things die down...
-
-
Replying to @HideNotSlide
In my entire career I have never seen the jockeying for regulatory capture opportunities as much as ...
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.