In its decision, the Supreme Court laid out its framework for classifying a security: A security exists when there is an "investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the efforts of others"
-
-
@eriz35 thread points out what I was saying in that there is legal ambiguity -
thx. is this a derivative of USDC or a contract? The former might fall under CFTC but the latter would be SEC I think (ianal) I didn't see COIN making this argument but keep in mind I am also very dumb
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m sorry but it’s an utter slam dunk for the Commission. Bitcoin’s status as a commodity is irrelevant here, just as the Howey court didn’t care that oranges were commodities. Don’t take my word for it but talk to some securities lawyers if you have contacts.
-
Playing devil's advocate here - SEC says Bitcoin is not a security, it's a commodity/replacement for currency. CFTC says stablecoins are an extension of this commodity/currency replacement dynamic. But now lending these coins makes it a security?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.