Gator market making is great, but it also has a downside - to make a market you have to keep gators ready to trade at all times. You have to hold inventory of a dangerous wild animal. Gators are unpredictable. And they bite. Hard.
-
Show this thread
-
You can buy protective armor to defend yourself, but this armor is expensive. You don't want to buy full body armor if you don't have to. Profit margins are slim, & optimizing for the most amount of safety with the least amount of armor will help save a ton of money.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
There are two ways to figure out this safety to profit relationship. One is w/probabilities - you can list all the potential ways & places a gator can bite you, model the most likely of these, & buy armor to protect against those outcomes.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
OR, you can approach it more precisely. You can study everything there is to know about the gator - its jaw size, hunger level, muscle strength, even mood & personality. You can know so much about your inventory that you can predict EXACTLY when & where that gator will bite.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Okay, time to explain the metaphor: Obviously, Flow Traders is the market maker. Market hedges are the expensive armor. ETFs are the gator. Re-read the above thread with these roles in mind.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Market making is about managing risky & unpredictable inventory. Many MMs hegdge to protect themselves, but hedging against every outcome is too expensive. Most MMs use stochastic models to hedge efficiently - they list a range of outcomes & hedge against the most likely ones.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Flow Traders is not most MMs. They hedge using deterministic modeling - they model ONE possible outcome and hedge against that outcome. They predict EXACTLY when the gator will bite.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
This way of market making has its advantages, mainly via cheaper, more efficient hedges. But the downside is stark - if their model or research is even slightly off, they protected against the wrong outcome & can lose big. How can a business survive this way?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Using deterministic modeling, Flow boasts a near spotless market making record. At one point in 2017 they had made it 34 straight months without a single losing day. They made nearly $1 billion in 2020 trading the global ETF markets with impressive efficacy:pic.twitter.com/LLOQVazbZg
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Deterministic modeling reminds me of a great
@TrevMcKendrick post on the science of magic tricks. What looks like magic is really just a glamorous recital of extremely hard work. Flow's precise predictive model isn't magic - it's tedious iteration. https://jacobian.org/2021/apr/7/embrace-the-grind/ …pic.twitter.com/y6ivetBLPS
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likesShow this thread
The way Flow Traders makes markets isn't the only unique & insane part of their story. I'll be doing a much deeper dive into Flow's origins, business & future as a public company in an upcoming post. Sign up below if interested:https://frontmonth.substack.com/
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.