Why’s it bad for LSE and good for ENX and DB1? Liquidity moves but not the economics accruing to the companies.
This is a good summary of Brexit's expected impacts on European exchanges. In short: - More fragmentation = less liquidity - $ moves from UK to EU on Jan 4 - Bad for LSE, good for ENX, DB1https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-markets-trading/brexit-big-bang-to-trigger-tectonic-trading-rift-in-europe-idUSKBN2930HQ?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Anews%7Csection%3Amain_content%7Cbutton%3Abody_link …
-
-
-
I think it could be bad for LSE bc less liquid markets are more vulnerable to competition. If firms are changing geographies there's a better chance they'll change venues as well with the right incentives.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Interesting to see
@semperfidem2004 view on this one? Firstly even FT featured an article ascertaining that many EU mgrs had had a fit at implication they could not trade shares via London. Hence it was shelved for largest ones! Derivatives aren’t moving tho as stated.#Brexit - Show replies
-
-
-
What do you mean "$ moves"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about impact on
$CBOE and it’s growth plans for Europe.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Open access was a huge thing pre-Brexit. Potentially very negative for futures exchanges. Is that dead in the water?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.