Good lord.
@YouTube says it didn't punish Crowder because he was "focused primarily on debating" when he repeatedly called me a "lispy queer."
You can harass queer people as much as you want as long as its sandwiched between "debating."
Unreal.https://twitter.com/thetomzone/status/1136136577372119042 …
-
-
So just to be clear, I could say the n-word on
@YouTube with no fear of punishment, as long as it was preceded with language that sounds even remotely like I may be engaged in “debate.” Can you confirm,@TeamYouTube?10 replies 2 retweets 94 likes -
Replying to @LauraIntravia @gaywonk and
I mean, at that point, it doesn't have to be debate. You can just be a famous gamer who appears reticent for all of five seconds.
1 reply 0 retweets 65 likes -
Replying to @firewordsparklr @LauraIntravia and
If you could please elaborate on your use of the adjective recident? To me it makes no sense in this sentence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeyitsF3nd3r @firewordsparklr and
Reticent: reserved, restrained
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I wouldn't of asked the context if I didn't know what the word was. I was saying in the context of the sentence it seems it was used wrong
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.