Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
In an unexpected move, Dr. Tedros, the WHO chief, said the theory that the coronavirus emerged accidentally from a lab in China required further investigation and that he was ready to deploy more experts to do sohttps://nyti.ms/3u7SLsh
"I do not believe that this assessment was extensive enough,” he said on Tuesday about an expert team's finding that a lab leak was unlikely. “Further data and studies will be needed to reach more robust conclusions.”http://nyti.ms/3u7SLsh
Dr. Tedros also acknowledged concerns about China’s refusal to share raw data about early Covid-19 cases. He said he hoped future studies would include “more timely and comprehensive data sharing.”http://nyti.ms/3u7SLsh
More on China's refusal to share data with the WHO team during their visit to Wuhanhttps://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/world/asia/china-world-health-organization-coronavirus.html …
Experts believe it is extremely unlikely it leaked from a lab located at the proximate epicentre of the outbreak bc the lab workers said so and they had training. Reminder just because a scientist says something doesn’t make it scientific evidence.
Looking forward to the weaponization and Balkanization of every international agency!
So we don't know how it emerged....but your wording is ill thought out and could support the rise in Asian hate crimes. Why not just say further emphasis is being put on finding out how the virus emerged in stead of calling out the lab theory?
The wording your referencing is derived from a quote (which is cited in the same thread) from the Director of the WHO. Should we stop reporting the news or nah?
Even Tedros could not stomach the swill served by the stooges.
Perhaps Tredos and the WHO feel emboldened by an influential member that recently rejoined. 
-And yet: they *still* released a report with a conclusion based on a lack of data without listing conflicts of interest of the "investigators" - that's not science, kids.pic.twitter.com/kBgw4AnF8x
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
