"A third issue is that the analysis presented in
Jones et al. (2020) does not take the ordinal scale of the age groups into account and treats all categories as exchangeable" Excellent by @HeldLeonhard but I wonder how many split-plot for repeated measures devotees realise this
On media coverage of Drosten study:
1) I was never interviewed by Bild and I am distancing from Bild's approach in its story
2) No reason to change conclusion of my own analysis https://osf.io/bkuar/
3) New review of the study by @kjm2 and @d_spiegelhttps://twitter.com/d_spiegel/status/1265167482450522124 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The question remains whether actual viral load in youngest (with naturally closest contact to others) is high enough to be highly infectious. Regarding secondary schools the results show hardly any difference to adults, either way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Interessant, danke. Eine neue Studie ist demnach zu befürworten, korrekt?
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.