With Trump’s demand for martial display on the streets of our capital city, I’m struck by how closely he and the GOP-in-Congress are adopting measures Americans opposed in the colonial era.
-
-
Show this thread
-
After Great Britain levied taxes on the colonists (akin to GOP taxing middle class for benefit of richest), Massachusetts Colony circulated a letter to sister colonies.
Show this thread -
The Massachusetts Circular Letter objected to British taxation. NJ and VA responded to MA favorably.
Show this thread -
The royal governor of Mass ordered the Mass Assembly to revoke the Circular letter, and the assembly refused.
Show this thread -
This led to the British occupation of Boston, the imposition of martial law, and the insistence by the governor that the residents of Boston feed and house the soldiers.
Show this thread -
The colonists resented the presence and the costs of having British soldiers on their streets, which they understood as tyrannical impositions.
Show this thread -
The Declaration of Independence labels the King a tyrant for his elevation of the military over civil power.pic.twitter.com/6RL5xUitVr
Show this thread -
I won’t belabor all the analogies between Trump and Congressional GOP activity and King George III’s and the British Parliament.
Show this thread -
But all the original state constitutions and ultimately the US federal constitution were meant to safeguard the populace from tyranny.
Show this thread -
Tyranny was not something American revolutionaries saw as being imposed by some totally alien, foreign element. They argued it was imposed by their own putative leader, the King of England.
Show this thread -
It would come as no surprise to John Adams or James Madison that in our own time, the menace of tyranny comes from our own president and his political party.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.