Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
HeerJeet's profile
Jeet Heer
Jeet Heer
Jeet Heer
Verified account
@HeerJeet

Tweets

Jeet HeerVerified account

@HeerJeet

1. Writer, The Nation https://www.thenation.com/authors/jeet-heer/ … 2. email: jeetheer1967 at gmail dot com 3. Twitter essayist 4. Drawn by Joe Ollmann

thenation.com
Joined June 2012

Tweets

  • © 2022 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Jeet Heer‏Verified account @HeerJeet 18 May 2018

      Jeet Heer Retweeted Clive Thompson

      Good thread on that terrific @NellieBowles profile of Jordan Peterson. One important take-away is that myth analysis (even Jungian informed myth analysis) shouldn't be left to the dingbats.https://twitter.com/pomeranian99/status/997492722633146370 …

      Jeet Heer added,

      Clive ThompsonVerified account @pomeranian99
      Here, @NellieBowles writes a superb profile of Jordan Peterson: https://nyti.ms/2k4Hya2  There’s the stuff he says to her that is obviously headline-generating, such as this soulless and (in his case, ideologically hypocritical) “enforced monogamy” stuff 1/x pic.twitter.com/IkaXQyfJfq
      Show this thread
      9 replies 91 retweets 272 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Jeet Heer‏Verified account @HeerJeet 18 May 2018

      You can be a Canadian who writes Jung-inflected myth analysis and teaches at the University of Toronto without being a dingbat. I mean, Northrop Frye did it. Because he understood myths existed in imaginative, not objective, realm.

      4 replies 27 retweets 156 likes
      Show this thread
      Jeet Heer‏Verified account @HeerJeet 18 May 2018

      The difference between Frye & Peterson is important. Both believed that primordial archetypes, found in myths & religious texts, shape perception. But Frye didn't claim these archetypes corresponded with objective reality. Nor did he think they were unchanging or monophonic

      9:35 AM - 18 May 2018
      • 14 Retweets
      • 124 Likes
      • liannecote SkipperWing! hi. Summer Gotschall gothicsynthetic Sara from Michigan: Colorado Edition 10 000 Rojos (Jules) Val Jobson Ondine, MD ☕️
      4 replies 14 retweets 124 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Jeet Heer‏Verified account @HeerJeet 18 May 2018

          I'm sympathetic to Peterson's claim that witches are real (which everyone is treating as pure whackadoodle). Imaginative constructs do have a type of existence. Numbers are real. The idea of human equality is real. But you can't touch either of them.pic.twitter.com/XRZwZfjZS7

          13 replies 13 retweets 83 likes
          Show this thread
        3. Jeet Heer‏Verified account @HeerJeet 18 May 2018

          Yes, witches are real: they are a powerful imaginative construct that has shaped perception in west for centuries. Problem is Peterson has flat idea of witches (they stand for chaos). But idea of witches can be used for all sorts of purposes: including idea of female empowerment

          17 replies 13 retweets 121 likes
          Show this thread
        4. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Ted Friedman‏ @tedfriedman 18 May 2018
          Replying to @HeerJeet

          Likewise, Jung himself is much more interesting than Peterson's essentialist caricature. See, for example, Susan Rowland's Jung: A Feminist Revision and David Tacey's How to Read Jung. @emilynussbaum @joshtpm

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Jeet Heer‏Verified account @HeerJeet 18 May 2018
          Replying to @tedfriedman @emilynussbaum @joshtpm

          Thanks for the reference! Very useful for something I'm working on.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation
        1. Cilliers van Niekerk‏ @ncilliersvn 18 May 2018
          Replying to @HeerJeet

          That "superordinate categories" correspond to objective reality is positively Platonic. Could we settle for psychological reality that has a convincingly traceable objective antecedence?

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Cullen Martin‏ @CulRMartin 18 May 2018
          Replying to @HeerJeet

          This thread is quite good. It is something that USA/America's bent toward technocratic empiricism cannot grasp. It's why most US intellectuals struggle with Kristeva or, for that matter, Umberto Eco—esp his oft neglected work: Search for the Perfect Language.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2022 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info