In reality the whole ‘redistribution of sex’ concept is as ridiculous as the ‘redistribution of love’. It is in many ways more preposterous than offensive. Framing it thus I think helps explain to anyone who needs it explained how silly it is that opeds on this get published.
-
-
Let alone enthusiastic consent
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not "U.S. Culture". No one considers this except a tiny fringe group on the internet & the musings of the chattering class thanks to a single well written article whose main point was entirely ignored in favor of points that could be written about to generate the most attention.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
...since forever.
End of conversation
-
-
-
A lot of Americans want to bring back the idea that there is no such thing as marital rape
-
And many have no idea how recently it was still not a legal concept in some parts of the country.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yikes. I’ve never thought of it this way before, but I have the sick feeling you might be right on.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Traditionally, consent was not the essential feature. Title, as in property rights, was what defined legitimate sex. Some people still think it should be.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sad, but true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.