Kevin Williamson: I'm being censored. Naive onlooker: That's terrible. [KW publishes in Commentary and WSJ] KW: I'm being censored. NO: Yes, I heard you the first time. [KW publishes in Weekly Standard & Washington Post] KW: I'm being censored. NO: Shut up already.
-
-
And Williamson continues to drop the suggestion that he wants to punish women who have abortion but doesn't want to spell out what they would be. That's very strange.pic.twitter.com/ARZgrg7JsE
Show this thread -
Williamson is willing to accept large numbers of abortion for foreseeable future, because total ban is "50- or even 100-year project." In other words, he's pro-life after we are all dead. But thinks abortion is worse than regular murder. That's not a coherent position.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He is not smart enough to come up with i) a better solution ii) a better opinion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jesus Christ this guy is still talking? WaPo couldn't find ANYONE more qualified to wax philosophical about abortion than this Anton LaVey wannabe dipshit?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe some pro-lifers are conflicted because they know deep down that the only abortion ban that truly works is the one where women decide for themselves whether to end a pregnancy. Yeah, life is hard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.