Kevin Williamson: I'm being censored. Naive onlooker: That's terrible. [KW publishes in Commentary and WSJ] KW: I'm being censored. NO: Yes, I heard you the first time. [KW publishes in Weekly Standard & Washington Post] KW: I'm being censored. NO: Shut up already.
-
-
If abortion is murder, why tolerate, out of political expediency, 90% of abortions. And as you move to restrict, why allow some states to have strong ban and others to be lax. That makes no sense.
Show this thread -
And Williamson continues to drop the suggestion that he wants to punish women who have abortion but doesn't want to spell out what they would be. That's very strange.pic.twitter.com/ARZgrg7JsE
Show this thread -
Williamson is willing to accept large numbers of abortion for foreseeable future, because total ban is "50- or even 100-year project." In other words, he's pro-life after we are all dead. But thinks abortion is worse than regular murder. That's not a coherent position.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What Kevin Williamson really means to say is that abortion is not murder. But he gets more ink if he obfuscates the issue and calls it "an absolute evil."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Narrator's voice: Because it is actually about controlling women. And every step toward that goal makes them feel good.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.