1. The current Chelsea Clinton quarrel with Amy Chozick is a good example of how feuds get handed down from one generation to the next. Clintons & Times have been fighting since early 1990s.https://twitter.com/thehill/status/988953503681908742 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Force of habit, it seems like. Reflexively making even non-stories part of a “pattern” of Clinton problems. “It’s false but it’s a problem for her because people believed it!” It’s lazy.
Thanks so much for that rare *thread* of
Mansplaining!
Chelsea Clinton isn't "challenging" the Times. She is calmly and politely requesting that Amy Chozick correct false information published in her book. That is a normal thing for someone to do. Your take on this is very silly.
I respectfully suggest that you circle back tomorrow to reread this to see if you can uncover your own tilt here. There is a glaring omission of critical thought embedded in this.
She is challenging a reporter who authored a book stating lies about her. Stop trying to stir the pot.
HeerJeet, get a real life.
It's called "manmisrepresenting"?
By saying she "felt the need" to challenge the Times suggests that you think the challenge was improper. What should she have done instead?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.