The Times has a "too good to check" problem regarding Clinton tales.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you admitting the Times coverage was biased? Do tell!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
translation: "Yes, I pulled Chelsea's tweet out of context and inserted it into a narrative I wanted to tweet about for clicks, but yeah I guess getting facts right in this case is important too."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But it was not a big factor in the Clinton campaign. You are arguing that the NY Times has failed as a serious journalistic effort, because they allowed resentment to bias their coverage. Whatabout the Clintons is irrelevant,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The truth of the matters is critical. To be serious, you must litigate. You can't just note that the NY Times & some private citizen disagree. Either it is a reliable newspaper or it isn't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trust seems to require some effort by the side requesting it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.